Rather Something - On "nothing" in King Lear
GRIN Verlag, 2007 - 52 Seiten
Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Literature, grade: 1,0, University of Heidelberg (Anglistisches Seminar), course: Shakespeare and the human evil, 18 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In Elizabethan English there was no figure standing for 'nothing'. But through the influence of Indian philosophy and mathematical concepts the sign '0' was established in Europe. This introduction had a strong impact - not only in mathematics. The idea assigned to it brought strong dispute with it. Especially in philosophy a lot of questions were being asked: What was the nature of 'nothing'?, Was 'nothing' really nothing?, Could one talk about 'nothing'? Didn't it become something thereby? etc. Questions like these appeared during the Nihilist movement in the 16th century, which eventually led to Nietzsche's statement "God is dead". Shakespeare used the term 'nothing' about forty times in different contexts within his tragedy King Lear. However, in most student guides and source books on King Lear, 'nothing' is not regarded as leitmotive. As Brian ROTMAN points out, William Shakespeare was "in the first generation of children in England to have learned about zero from Robert Recorde's Arithmetic." In addition to his frequent use of 'nothing', Shakespeare lets two of his main characters deal with the aspect of 'nothing': the play dramatizes " ...] reductions to nothing, charting the annihilation of human warmth, the dissolution of social, natural, familial bonds, the emptying of kindness, sympathy, tenderness, love, pity, affection into hollow shells, into substitutes for themselves ...]." The main thesis of this essay is based on the mathematical concept of 'nothing' in which zero is the narrow borderline between positive and negative. Hence, Edgar can not be right when stating "Edgar I nothing am." Although in most secondary sources relevant for King Lear Gloucester usually is regarded as Lea
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
13th century Italy abakus Act Act development Act II Act akademische Texte Arden Shakespeare Basingstoke beggar Brian ROTMAN points Burckhardt Burgundy CHAPTER device of hamartia DIAMETRAL DEVELOPMENT Edmund element in King essay everything FLEISSNER fool tells Geburt der Null Geschichte der Null GLOUCESTER going mad Goneril and Regan GRIN Verlag Hampshire and London Harold History of Mathematics Houndsmill Indian philosophy Jeremy GRAY eds John and Jeremy Kent Lear and Edgar Lear learns Lear trust Lear's Leonardo Fibonacci literature love test main character majesty manhunt mathematical concept mathematical sense mathematicians meaning of chaos Michele Sharon Minnesota Review models in Indian number standing NZZ Folio O'Bedlam Open University posession proove R. A. Foakes Robert F scene schwere Geburt Seyford Shakespeare Quarterly Shakespeare's King Lear Signifying Sigurd Skulsky speech Stefanie Klering sunya tells Lear tells the truth thing thou art throughout the play Tom O'Bedlam Tragedies understand Walton-on-Thames William Shakespeare zero and Q]nyat