...navigable waters within their respective limits. The shores of navigable waters, and the soils tinder them, were not granted by the Constitution to the...States, but were reserved to the states respectively; and the new states have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original...

...limits. Again, say the court, the shores of the navigable waters and the soil over which the tide ffows, were not granted by the constitution to the United...States, but were reserved to the States respectively ; and the rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction of the new States over this subject, is co-extensive...

...irresistable. First, That the mines of gold and silver and of the baser metals with which either is connected, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states within whose territorial limits they are situated respectively : Secondly, The new states have the...

...irresistable. First, That the mines of gold and silver and of the baser inetals with which either is connected, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states within whose territorial limits they are situated respectively : / .. Secondly, The new states have...

...irresistible. First, That the mines of gold and silver and of the baser metals with which either is connected, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states within whose territorial limits they are situated respectively: Secondly, The new states have the same...

...at the time Alabama was admitted into the Union. That the shores of navigable waters, and the soil under them, were not granted by the constitution to...States, but were reserved to the states respectively ; and that the new states have the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction over the subject as the...

...Supreme Court came to the following conclusions, namely : " First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution...jurisdiction over this subject as the original States." The doctrine of this case has been considered, and affirmed, and reaffirmed, in the subsequent cases...

...First, The shores of navigable waters and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution of the United States, but were reserved to the States...the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over the subject, as the original States. Thirdly, The right of the United States to the public lands, ami...

...First, The shores of navigable waters and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution of the United States, but were reserved to the States...the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over the subject, as the original States. Thirdly, The right of the United States to the public lands, and...

...the case of Pollard v. Hagan, (iii Howard, 212,) that the shores of navigable waters, and the soil under them, were not granted by the Constitution to...States, but were reserved to the States respectively ; and the new States have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original...