Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

Mr. Grey's motion is negatived by 236 against 30-The three

first articles voted-The majorities upon the other articles.

in the like proportion-Lord Hawkesbury's speech upon

the general nature of representation in parliament

Difference between the Scotch and Irish peers as stated by Lord
Grenville-Lord Mulgrave objects to the Irish peers eligi-
bility for sitting in the commons-The chancellor of the ex-
chequer supports the original clause-Lord Mulgrave's mo-

tion negatived by 50 against 7-Lord Holland moves,

that some pledge be given to the Catholics, promising relief

from the disabilities under which that respectable body la-

boured

Lord Borrington opposes the motion as unseasonable-The

Marquis of Lansdowne is convinced of the wisdom of the

measure at large and not inimical to the motion

Lord Fitzwilliam thought the motion conciliatory and expedient

-Lord Hobart and the Earl of Liverpool moved the previous

question-The Earl of Moira wished the previous question

might be withdrawn-Lord Grenville thought that the ques-

tion of Catholic emancipation would be best treated by an

united parliament-The previous question superseded the

motion-Several petitions from the woollen manufacturers of

Great Britain presented to the House of Commons against

the free exportation of raw materials, &c.-Witnesses ex-

amined at the bar-The commercial article passed the 1st

May, 1800

Mr. Bankes in the course of the debates was of opinion, that

the scheme was hazardous from the discontent of the Catho-

lics-Sir William Young declares the union very much ap-

proved of by the Catholics, from the report of Lord Kenmare

-The second reading of the resolutions ordered,-For the

second reading, 208, against it, 26-On the 5th May the

commercial article with its clauses, agreed to

Various motions in the House of Commons by Dr. Lawrence,

Mr. Grey, Sir William Dolben, and Mr. Tierney-All

negatived-An address voted, importing, that the House of

Commons observed with satisfaction, that the articles trans-

mitted from Ireland were conformable to those voted in that

house last session-The address communicated to the peers

-On the 7th permission granted to Irish peers to represent

British counties or boroughs

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

spiritual and temporal, for the Imperial parliament, as well

then, as hereafter-The resolutions sent back from England

referred by the Irish commons to a private committee 314

Sir Lawrence Parsons moves for a consideration in a general

committee-The motion lost-The resolutions formed into

a bill and leave to introduce it-A bill for the Union of Great

Britain and Ireland, carried by 160 against 100-Mr. Grat-

tan moves to put off the bill till the 1st of August, branding

it with constitutional murder carried through by force of mar-

tial law and corruption-Lord Castlereagh defends the bill,

and censures Mr. Grattan's language as inflammatory-Sir

John Parnell repels any traitorous disposition in the Anti-

unionists-A violent debate

Mr. Grattan's motion lost by 124 against 87-Lord Corry moves

a long address to the king against the bill-Seconded by

Messrs. Saurin, Goold, Egan, and J. C. Beresford-Opposed

by the attorney general. The address negatived by 135

against 77-Address comprising the arguments of the Anti-

unionists in the appendix, No. CXX-Many Anti-unionists

retire from the house--The bill carried up to the peers-On

its second reading the Earls Farnham and Bellamont offer

some clauses, which are negatived-The bill passes the com-

mittee without amendment, and read a third time 13th of

June-A protest entered by the Duke of Leinster and the

other dissenting peers

The minister's plan of indemnity for the extinction of boroughs

at the rate of 15,000l. each borough exposes a necessary de-

mand by way of grant upon the public, of 1,260,000/-Mr.

Saurin, C. Beresford, and Mr. Dawson maintain, that they

had no right to indemnity-Mr. Prendergast maintains the

justice of the plan, which was adopted-The same plan pre-

sented to the lords and only opposed by the Earl of Farnham

-The Anti-unionists give up the question for lost-A list of

the members who voted for and against this great question,

and the parliamentary arrangements preparatory therefor,

appendix, No. CXXII.-After the bill passed the Irish par-

liament, Mr. Pitt introduces a similar bill in the British Com-

mons-Sent on the 24th June to the British Peers—The

British Bill receives the royal assent, 2d July, 1800-The

British parliament prorogued-His majesty's speech to both

houses

The royal assent given in Ireland to the Union bill on the anni-

versary of the accession of the House of Brunswick to the

thrones of Great Britain and Ireland, 1st August, 1800-The

act at length in the Appendix, No. CXXIII.-The lord

lieutenant's speech to both houses of the Irish parliament

[ocr errors]
« ZurückWeiter »