Eyre vs. Countess of Shaftesbury. English and American Notes. 2 Leading Cases in Equity, (4th Am. Ed.) 1416. 2 White and Tudor, (6th Am. Ed.) 693. Re John Sharp, (Idaho). 96 Pac., 563. 18 L. R. A., 886. Case Note. Re Edith Pryse, (Kansas). 85 Kan., 556. 118 Pac., 56. 41 L. R. A., 564. Case note. Commonwealth vs. Fisher, (Pa.) 213 Pa. St., 48. 62 Atl., 198. Cinque vs. Boyd, (Conn.). 121 Atl., 678. 2. General Works on Substantive Law: 3 Story's Equity Jurisprudence, (14th Ed.) Sec. 1742-1784, Infants. 3 Pomeroy's Equity Jurisprudence, (2nd Ed.) Sec. 1307-1310, Infants. 14 Ruling Case Law, Special Protection of Infants by Law, pp. 267279. The Spirit of the Common Law, by Roscoe Pound, Carter Professor of Jurisprudence in Harvard University. Marshall Jones Company, Boston, 1921. 3. Special works treating of the forms of anti-social conduct with which family courts have to deal: Conduct and its Disorders, (1 vol.) by Charles Arthur Mercer, M.D., Examiner in Mental Diseases and Psychology in the University of London. MacMillan, London, 1911. Studies in the Psychology of Sex, (6 vol.) by Havelock Ellis, M.D. 4. Special Publications: The Juvenile Court, by Julian W. Mack, Harvard Law Review, vol. 23, p. 104, December, 1909. The Legal Aspect of the Juvenile Court, monograph prepared for the Children's Bureau by Bernard Flexner and Reuben Oppenheimer, U. S. Dept. of Labor, Children's Bureau, Publication No. 99. Also published in 58 American Law Review, 65. A Summary of Juvenile Court Legislation in the United States: Sophonisba P. Breckenridge and Helen R. Jeter, U. S. Dept. of Labor, Children's Bureau, Publication No. 70, Legal Series No. 5, 1920. See also Probation Laws and Court Decisions, 1923. Proceedings of the National No attempt is made at completeness. The citations will lead the student into the extensive literature of the subject. Probation Association, 17th Annual Conference, Washington, D. C., May 14-19, 1923. Juvenile Court Standards: Report of the Committee appointed by the Children's Bureau, U. S. Dept. of Labor, Children's Bureau, Publication No. 121. Proceedings of the Conference on Juvenile Court Standards, held under the auspices of the U. S. Children's Bureau and the National Probation Association, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, June 21-22, 1921. U. S. Dept. of Labor, Children's Bureau, Publication No. 97. The Practical Value of Scientific Study of Juvenile Delinquents, monograph prepared for the Children's Bureau by William Healy, M.D., Director, Judge Baker Foundation, Boston. U. S. Dept. of Labor, Children's Bureau, Publication No. 96. Probation in Children's Courts, monograph prepared for the Children's Bureau by Charles L. Chute, Secretary, New York State Probation Commission; Secretary, National Probation Association, U. S. Dept. of Labor; Dependent, Defective and Delinquent Classes, Series No. 11, Children's Bureau, Publication No. 80. Standards for Socialized Courts, by George E. Worthington, Acting Director, Dept. of Legal Measures, American Social Hygiene Association, and Ruth Topping, Field Secretary, Bureau of Social Hygiene. Journal of Social Hygiene, Vol. X, page 335, June, 1924. Study of Specialized Courts Dealing with Sex Delinquency, by George E. Worthington and Ruth Topping. Journal of Social Hygiene: I. The Morals Court of Chicago, vol. VII, October, 1921. II. The Miscreants Division of the Philadelphia Municipal Court, vol. VIII, p. 23, January, 1922. III. The Second Sessions of the Municipal Court of the City of Boston, vol. VIII, p. 191, April, 1922. IV. The Woman's Day Court of Manhattan and the Bronx, vol. VIII, V. Summary and Comparative Study of the Specialized Courts of A Study of the Sex Life of the Normal Married Woman: Katharine B. Davis, General Secretary, Bureau of Social Hygiene, Journal of Social Hygiene.70 I. The Use of Contraceptives, vol. VIII, p. 173, April, 1922. II. The Happiness of Married Life, vol. IX, p. 1, January, 1923. III. Same subject continued, vol. IX, p. 129, March, 1923. Young Girl Marriages in Criminal and Juvenile Courts: Arthur W. Towne, Superintendent, Brooklyn Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Journal of Social Hygiene, vol. VIII, p. 287, July, 1922. 5. Special Reports: Proceedings of the National Probation Association: The Social Service of the Courts, Providence, R. I., June, 1922. A Standard Juvenile Court Act, Toronto, June, 1924. Reports of the Committee on Child Welfare Legislation to the Colorado Legislature of 1923. Pamphlet issued by the Committee, Mrs. Inez J. Lewis, Chairman, Colorado Springs, Colo. ToThese studies are of value because they approach the subject of the broken home from the standpoint of normality as distinguished from pathologic or abnormal conditions. REPORT OF TREASURER Denver, Colorado, September 18, 1924. To The Colorado Bar Association: Your Treasurer reports the following income and outgo from July 31, 1923, to September 18, 1924: Out West Printing Co., stationery and postage, voucher 809 8.25 10.00 Antlers Hotel, hotel expenses annual speaker, voucher 811 94.45 120.00 12.50 C. P. Gehman, reporting 26th annual meeting, voucher 814 118.00 Gus Smith, moving records, voucher 815 Pershing, Nye, Fry & Tallmadge, telephones and sundries, Bradford-Robinson Printing Co., printing, stationery, postage, an- 1.00 2.75 1.45 1,611.75 53.87 15.00 77.35 Amick Transfer & Storage Co., storage records, vouchers 824 and 836 36.00 Frank H. Hall, Grievance Committee expenses, voucher 825...... Postage, wire and long distance telephones, vouchers 826, 827 and 839 18.54 17.50 Refunds admission fees, vouchers 830 and 837 12.00 M. E. Tully, bar memorial committee expenses, voucher 832 Such balance of $3,623.85 is on deposit to the credit of The Colorado Bar Association with Colorado National Bank, of Denver, Colorado, as evidenced by the certificate of said bank herewith tendered. REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON GRIEVANCES To The Colorado Bar Association: The Grievance Committee has met a number of times this year for consideration of complaints, the general nature of which is largely consistent with those of previous years. Most of the cases involved deal with matters for which disbarment could, perhaps, not be asked; others were matters where under the degree of proof required for disbarment, the necessary evidence could not be secured. Disbarment proceedings were determined upon in one instance, which will be under way in the near future. The vast majority of the complaints emphasize the need of dealing with the average case by some method other than that at present employed. The Committee itself is able to come to a conclusion, but when it has done so, can only administer a rebuke which, in the nature of things, is known only to the attorney under investigation and to the Committee, itself. The profession and the general public remain in ignorance of matters which should be brought to their attention. Charges can be filed with the Supreme Court asking suspension or disbarment. This remedy, however, is harsh and not likely to be set on foot. In cases where it is appropriate, almost universally, the necessary evidence is not forthcoming. A public reprimand by the Committee, if proper authority were delegated by the Supreme Court, would be a most effective method of enforcing proper attention to ethical standards. The mere possibility of its use would accomplish more than the cumbersome and exacting methods at present in vogue. The situation is very much as though hanging or life imprisonment were the only penalty imposed by the criminal law for crimes of every degree and kind. A natural hesitancy follows toward the infliction of such a penalty for petty larceny; yet otherwise the criminal must go scot free. Your Committee believes that if a proper committee had power to discipline attorneys within certain limits-subject to review by the Supreme Court in cases of disbarment and suspen |