Taft, Holmes, and the 1920s Court: An Appraisal
Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1998 - 174 Seiten
This study of William Howard Taft and Oliver Wendell Holmes delivers much more than the title suggests, yet the title remains appropriate. This is an account not only of their common membership on the Court in the 1920s but an explanation, by means of a quasi-biographical method, of how they arrived at the summit of their careers as public men. By probing their Puritan influence, the foundations of much of what they believed and ruled upon as judges become clear and persuasive. Their public lives diverged, to be sure. Taft and Holmes both began as judges at the state level only to have Taft veer off in the direction of high-level administrative and elective offices.
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
The Times and the Judges
3 weitere Abschnitte werden nicht angezeigt.
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
action Amendment American appeared authority became become believe Brandeis called capital century Chief Justice civil commerce Common Law Company Congress conservative Constitution continued contract corporation deal decision dissent effect effort England especially experience fact favor federal force given ground hand Harvard Holmes Holmes's ideas important insisted interest involved issue judges judgment judicial labor later legislation less Letters liberty living majority matter means Michigan mind moral natural once opinion passed philosophy political Pollock position present President Press principle Progressive protection Puritan question reason regulation respect response Roosevelt rule Senate social society statute Supreme Court Taft Taft and Holmes Taft's thinking thought tion took understanding union United University Wendell William Howard workers writing wrote York