'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall ElegyeCambridge University Press, 19.09.2002 - 568 Seiten 'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare addresses the fundamental issue of what Shakespeare actually wrote, and how this is determined. In recent years his authorship has been claimed for two poems, the lyric 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye. These attributions have been accepted into certain major editions of Shakespeare's works but Brian Vickers argues that both attributions rest on superficial verbal parallels; both use too small a sample, ignore negative evidence, and violate basic principles in authorship studies. Through a fresh examination of the evidence, Professor Vickers shows that neither poem has the stylistic and imaginative qualities we associate with Shakespeare. In other words, they are 'counterfeits', in the sense of anonymously authored works wrongly presented as Shakespeare's. He argues that the poet and dramatist John Ford wrote the Elegye: its poetical language (vocabulary, syntax, prosody) is indistinguishable from Ford's, and it contains several hundred close parallels with his work. By combining linguistic and statistical analysis this book makes an important contribution to authorship studies. |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-5 von 50
Seite i
... criticism , Shakespeare : the Critical Heritage , 1623-1801 ( 1974–1981 , 1996 ) ; Returning to Shakespeare ( 1989 ) ; Appropri- ating Shakespeare . Contemporary Critical Quarrels ( 1993 ) ; and Shakespeare , Co - author . A Historical ...
... criticism , Shakespeare : the Critical Heritage , 1623-1801 ( 1974–1981 , 1996 ) ; Returning to Shakespeare ( 1989 ) ; Appropri- ating Shakespeare . Contemporary Critical Quarrels ( 1993 ) ; and Shakespeare , Co - author . A Historical ...
Seite xii
... critics objected that he had not used correct scholarly methods . Taylor had compiled a list of words and phrases in the poem for which he cited parallels in Shakespeare , but he made at least three major errors : he failed to check the ...
... critics objected that he had not used correct scholarly methods . Taylor had compiled a list of words and phrases in the poem for which he cited parallels in Shakespeare , but he made at least three major errors : he failed to check the ...
Seite xiii
... critics completely wrong . — Since Foster used many more different approaches than Taylor , I have had to devote correspondingly more space to evaluating his methodology and results . The first seven chapters in Part I discuss the ...
... critics completely wrong . — Since Foster used many more different approaches than Taylor , I have had to devote correspondingly more space to evaluating his methodology and results . The first seven chapters in Part I discuss the ...
Seite xv
... critics , Foster stated that his Shakespeare attribution ' now rests on a broad and substantial foundation . What's required to dislodge it is not just the overthrow of a few minor points ( though I do not see where even that has ...
... critics , Foster stated that his Shakespeare attribution ' now rests on a broad and substantial foundation . What's required to dislodge it is not just the overthrow of a few minor points ( though I do not see where even that has ...
Seite xix
... criticism . As I point out , authorship studies , almost more than other branches of literary criticism , is prone to two tempta- tions . One is the pursuit of scholarly disagreement in a personal manner , as if the goal of such ...
... criticism . As I point out , authorship studies , almost more than other branches of literary criticism , is prone to two tempta- tions . One is the pursuit of scholarly disagreement in a personal manner , as if the goal of such ...
Inhalt
1 | |
PART I Donald Fosters Shakespearean construct | 55 |
PART II John Fords Funerall Elegye | 261 |
Appendices | 467 |
Notes | 509 |
554 | |
563 | |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall ... Brian Vickers Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2002 |
'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall ... Brian Vickers Keine Leseprobe verfügbar - 2009 |
'Counterfeiting' Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship and John Ford's Funerall ... Brian Vickers Keine Leseprobe verfügbar - 2002 |
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
Abrams abstract ascription attribution authorship studies Brian Vickers canon Christes Bloodie Sweat cited critics Cyrus Hoy death Dekker described diction discussion Donald Foster doth dramatist edition editors Elegy Elegye's Elizabethan Elliott and Valenza English essay evidence fair Fames Memoriall figure Ford's plays Ford's poems Foster claimed frequently Funeral Elegy Funerall Elegye Golden Meane hendiadys Henry instances John Ford Laws of Candy linguistic literary Love's Sacrifice Lover's Melancholy mind modern Monsarrat Mountjoy never Noble noun occurs opinion Oxford passage percent Perkin Warbeck phrase poem's poet poet's poetry praise prose published punctuation readers recurs refer Renaissance rhetoric rhyme Richard sample scenes scholars sequence Shakespeare's authorship Sonnets stanza statistics style stylistic Sun's Darling syntactical syntax Taylor tests thee Thomas thou tion usage verb verse line Vickers virtue vocabulary William Peter William Shakespeare Witch of Edmonton words writing wrote youth