...read it himself. To pursue the conclusion of the narrative in Camden's words; when it was demanded if he had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced against him, he answered with and thereby they might love her the better, and honour her the more, as being God's own...

...the second occasion, which was shortly after, the jury having brought him in guilty, he was as usual asked whether he had anything to say why judgment should not be passed upon him. Fox answered, "I am no lawyer, yet I have much to say if thou wilt have patience to...

...Joseph L. Hooper, prosecuting attorney, brought to the bar for sentence, and having been there asked if he had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced against him, and alleging no good reason to the contrary, therefore, be it ordered and adjudged by the court now...

...prosecuting attorney brought to the bar of the court for sentence, and having then been asked by the court if he had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced against him, and alleging no reason to the contrary thereof, — and the said respondent was found to be above sixteen,...

...daily labours." Before the admission of Nayler to hear his sentence, it was moved that he should be asked whether he had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced upon him ; which was determined in the negative, by one hundred and seven to seven. On the speaker...

...evident reluctance, returned a renikt of guilty. On being asked, in the usual form, whether h10 11 had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced against him, he replied that he was perfectly innocent of the charges of Cobham, but that he submitted himself to the...

...record does not show that after a plea of guilty, and before sentence, the court asked the defendant if he had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced against him, in the absence of a bill of exceptions showing the contrary, it will be presumed that such question...

...Acts 1855, p. 151, Sec. 4. 15 A. 498, State \. Markham. "I. It is not necessary to ask the accused if he had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced against him. 27 A. 393, State v. Taylor. 3. The remark in the decree, " and having nothing to offer in arrest of...

...And the defendant being duly informed by the cour.t of the verdict of the jury, and inquired of if he had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced against him ; and having nothing but what he hath already said [or, and showing no good and sufficient cause why...

...good reason to and did believe, adjudged him guilty of the said felony, although upon being asked if he had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced against him, deponent reiterated the objections urged by his counsel, and requested the said mayor to defer the...