...and apologize for fuch men, it was much to be lamented. A certain Biihop was faid to have declared, that the people had nothing to do with the laws but to obey them, while modern democrats, on the contrary, held the doctrine that they have every thing to do with the...

...apologise for fuch men, it was much to be lamented. •\ certain Bifhop was faid to have declared, that the people had nothing to do with the laws but to obey them, while modern democrats, on the contrary, held the dodlrine that they have every thing to do with the...

...unconstitutional expreffion which had a few days before fallen from the bifliop of Rochsfter, namely, that " the people had nothing to do with the laws but to obey them." With refpeft to what had been urgetf by lord Grenvilie in defence of the bill, he obferved, that as...

...after a severe rebuke from the head of the house of Bedford, explained away the odious proposition, " that the people had nothing to do with the laws but to obey them !" The right honourable exsecretary, who represents a large manufacturing city, which has been scratched...

...after a severe rebuke from the head of the House of Bedford, explained away the odious proposition, " that the people had nothing to do with the laws but to obey them !" The right honourable Ex-secretary, who represents a large manufacturing city, which has been scratched...

...participation in the state; and it was in vain that the high-priest in those days told them, that they had nothing to do with the laws but to obey them. — They said, tliat laws made by one set of persons, bore too hard upon them, and their interests were to be...

...distraction of the times, and the consequent ' On the IQth of April, 1653. f In this instance certainly the people had nothing to do with the laws but to obey them; and I am rather surprised that the Prelate, (Dr. Horsley at that time bishop of Rochester,) who made...

...authority, considerable talents, and great learning (the Bishop of Rochester) had said, that the mass of the people had nothing to do with the laws, but to obey them. And this strange assertion had been made by a member of that order, who bevond all others were taught...

...all licentious freedom of remark or complaint might be strictly and vigilantly repressed ; adding, that the " people had nothing to do with the laws but to obey them." \Vhen he was reproved for this imperious declaration, he qualified it by allowing that individuals...

...could be so indiscreet, and so ignorant of the principles of our constitution to say,) " The mass of the people had nothing to do with the laws but to obey them !" Sir Edward Knatchbull explained again that he did not mean to throw any reflection on the persons...