 The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved.  The Canadian Law Times - Seite 8721908Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | 1869 - 972 Seiten
...delivered the judgment of the Exchequer Chamber in this case, and observed as follows : " The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running-down cases; it has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1867 - 468 Seiten
...distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong...express command or privity of the master be proved. (3) That principle is acted upon every day in (1) 7 H. & N. 172; 30 LJ (Ex.) 337. (2) Hern v. Nichols,... | |
 | Albert Venn Dicey - 1870 - 582 Seiten
...distiuctlon can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is that the master is answerable for every such wrong...express command or privity of the master be proved ... In all ^the] cases [in which the master has been held liable], it may he said that the master has... | |
 | India - 1878 - 710 Seiten
...distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Francis Wharton - 1874 - 960 Seiten
...Ashton, LR 4 QB 476. § 161. Thus it has been judicially declared in England,1 that "the general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running-down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1874 - 880 Seiten
...observed,5 " can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong...though no express command or privity of the master can be proved." Ill Fuller v. Wilson, which was an action on the case for a fraudulent misrepresentation... | |
 | Thomas William Saunders - 1874 - 238 Seiten
...distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule, is that the master is answerable for every such wrong...benefit, though no express command or privity of the matter be proved : (Laugher v. Pointer, 5 B. & C. 547, at p. 554.) That principle is acted upon every... | |
 | Sir Henry Sutton - 1874 - 308 Seiten
...in the scope of his employment and in executing ' the matter for which he was engaged at the time, though no ' express command or privity of the master be proved." It is not enough to prove that the act was for the benefit of the master, but it must be in the ordinary... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 830 Seiten
...drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is anewerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is...though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher p. Pointer, о Barn. & C. 047, 554. The nature of the action is still... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 808 Seiten
...no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong...as is committed in the course of the service, and lor the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher... | |
| |
