Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small]

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Washington, D.C. 20402

HD 181 64 1.86

PREFACE

This volume of Decisions of the Department of the Interior covers the period from January 1, 1979 to December 31, 1979. It includes the most important administrative decisions and legal opinions that were rendered by officials of the Department during the period.

The Honorable Cecil D. Andrus, served as Secretary of the Interior during the period covered by this volume; Mr. James A. Joseph served as Under Secretary; Ms. Joan Davenport, Messrs. Robert Herbst, Guy Martin, Larry Meierotto, Forrest Girard served as Assistant Secretaries of the Interior; Mr. Leo Krulitz, served as Solicitor. Ms. Ruth R. Banks, served as Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

This volume will be cited within the Department of the Interior as "86 I.D."”

Carild Andena

Secretary of the Interior.

II

ERRATA:

Page 3-Right col., line 2, correct to: Stat. 189, 224),

Page 30—Right col., 4th line from bottom of page, correct date to read: Aug. 4, 1976,

Page 257-Left col., headnote 2, the first line is not included. Headnote should start with: Application by the State of Alaska for lands under the Page 295-Left col., par. 1, line 4, correct to read: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. Page 302-Footnote 14, para. 2, line 4, correct to read: 92 Stat. 3206 Nov. 9, 1978. Page 362-Left col., par. 1, lines 8 & 9, correct to read: 34 Stat. 197 as amended by Page 435-Right col., 4th par. (2nd quoted par.) delete 4th sentence so it will read: [U]nder Section 349 [25 U.S.C.] it is obvious that the Secretary of the Interior patent in fee simple to a trust allottee ought to be satisfied not only that the allottee is competent and capable of managing his or her affairs, but also that it would be to the best interest of the allottee for the allottee to become emancipated from the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States and become subject to the laws of the state in which he resides.

Page 629-Right col., 2d para., line 26 & 27, correct citation to read: Solicitor's Opinion, 74 I.D. 285 (1967)

Page 688-Left col., 4th line from top of page, correct to read: history of 23 U.S.C. § 131 (1976)

IV

[blocks in formation]
« ZurückWeiter »