Against the Tide: A Critical Review by Scientists of How Physics and Astronomy Get Done
Nobody should have a monopoly of the truth in this universe. The censorship and suppression of challenging ideas against the tide of mainstream research, the blacklisting of scientists, for instance, is neither the best way to do and filter science, nor to promote progress in the human knowledge. The removal of good and novel ideas from the scientific stage is very detrimental to the pursuit of the truth. There are instances in which a mere unqualified belief can occasionally be converted into a generally accepted scientific theory through the screening action of refereed literature and meetings planned by the scientific organizing committees and through the distribution of funds controlled by "club opinions". It leads to unitary paradigms and unitary thinking not necessarily associated to the unique truth. This is the topic of this book: to critically analyze the problems of the official (and sometimes illicit) mechanisms under which current science (physics and astronomy in particular) is being administered and filtered today, along with the onerous consequences these mechanisms have on all of us. Apart from the editors, Juan Miguel Campanario, Brian Martin, Wolfgang Kundt, J. Marvin Herndon, Marian Apostol, Halton C. Arp, Tom Van Flandern, Andrei P. Kirilyuk, Dmitri Rabounski and Henry H. Bauer, all of them professional researchers, reveal a pessimistic view of the miseries of the actual system, while a glimmer of hope remains in the "leitmotiv" claim towards the freedom in doing research and attaining an acceptable level of ethics in science.
Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire
Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
academic activity affiliation anonymous applications arXiv.org astronomy astrophysics become blacklisted budget Cal Tech Carlos Castro Carlos Handy causally complete challengers Chemical & Engineering comets conflicts of interest correct CTSPS DAMTP dark matter discovery dissidents E-mail ence evidence extraordinary extraterrestrial field fundamental funding galaxies Ginsparg human hypothesis ideas institutes interaction journals Kirilyuk Kundt mainstream mathematical nanotechnology Naschie nature neutron stars objective observations obtain official science paper paradigm Paul Marmet peer review person physicists physics political position possible practice predictions problems professional published quantum quantum computation quasars reality redshift referees rejected research in Romania revolution Romanian politicians science of complexity science organisation scientific knowledge scientific method scientists social society structure talk telescope theory things tion Tom Van Flandern Tony Smith truth understand unitary science universal science unreduced usually
Page 16 - Autobiography, sadly remarked that "a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.