soever, can not rest in aught else. But the desire of truth is not satisfied till it reach the highest Source and Author of all.” We noted before that in the system of Aquinas God is the Creator and End of Man. The imperfection of our knowledge, and the desire we have for a more and more perfect knowledge, opens out the prospect of another life to Aquinas, where the God we know so little about at present will be known as the Infinite, Allembracing Reality that will give us not only intellectual peace, but will spread before us riches now unknown. Aquinas then justly remarks, "let those blush who seek the happiness of man, so highly placed, in lower things." 4 C. G., 1. 3, c. 50. 5 C. G., 1. 3. c. 49. BIBLIOGRAPHY. WORKS OF ST. THOMAS. SUMMA THEOLOGICA. Pars Prima, Questions 2-26, 44-49. (Commentaries of Cajetan and Capreolus). SUMMA CONTRA GENTILES. Books 1; 2, cc. I-27; 4, 17-25, 49-76. (Commentary of Ferrariensis). COMMENTARY ON THE SENTENCES OF THE LOMBARD. Book I. QUAESTIONES DISPUTATAE: De Potentia Dei, articles II. De Creatione, articles 19. De Simplicitate Divinae Essentiae, articles II. DE VERITATE : Quaestiones: 1. De Veritate, articles 12. OPUSCULA: 2. De Scientia Dei, articles 15. 5. De Providentia, articles 10. 13. De Differentia Divini Verbi et Humani. 14. De Natura Verbi Intellectus. 2. Compendium Theologiae ad Fratrem Reginaldum. 51. De Intellectu et Intelligibili. 68. Super Librum De Trinitate. BIBLIOGRAPHIES. Bibliographie thomiste de 1878 à 1888. Annal. de Phil. Chret., Sep. 1888, 577-603. SCHNEID, M. Die Litteratur über die thomistsche Philosophie seit der Encyclika Aeterni Patris. Jahr. f. Phil. u. Spek. Theol., 1887, 269–308. WORKS ON SCHOLASTICISM. DEWULF. Histoire de la Philosophie Medievale. 1900, 259– 290. DUBLIN REVIEW. Authority of the Scholastic Philosophy. v. 13, N. S., 33-48. The Relation of Scholastic to Modern Philosophy. v. 20, 281-326. Pope Leo XIII. and Modern Studies. v. 3, 3. S., 190-210. GUTHLIN. La Scolastique et Aristote. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1882, 255-262. HAURÉAU. Histoire de la Philosophe Scolastique. v. 2. HEBÉRT, M. Thomisme et Kantisme. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1886, 364–385. PICAVET, F. Le Mouvement Neo-Thomiste. Revue Philosophique, v. 33, 281–309; v. 35, 394-422. REGNON DE. Quelques mots sur la Scolastique. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1885, 17–30. ROVCE, J. Pope Leo's Philosophical Movement and its Relations to Modern Thought. Boston Evening Transcript. July 29, 1903. (To be found also in The Review of Catholic Pedagogy, Dec. 1903.) STÖCKL. Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters. v. 2, 421-734. TALAMO. L'Aristotelismo Della Scolastica. 1881. TURNER, W. History of Philosophy. 1903, 343–381. WARD, W. The Scholastic Movement and Catholic Philosophy. Dublin Review, v. 25, 3. S., 255-272. WORKS ON ST. THOMAS. EUCKEN. Die Philosophie des Thomas von Aquino und die Cultur der Neuzeit. Zeitschr. f. Phil. u. Philos. Kritik, v. 87-88. Thomas von Aquino und Kant, ein Kampf zweier Welten. Kant Studien, v. 6. ADEODATUS, AUREL. Die Philosophie des hl. Thomas von Aquin. Köln, 1887. pp. 64. (It answers Eucken's article.) CHURCH QUARTERLY REVIEW. St. Thomas Aquinas. v. II, 59-78. DOMET DE VORGES. Philosophie de Saint Thomas d'Aquin, par dom Mayeu Lamey. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1885, 595-605. DUBLIN REVIEW. Letter of Pope Leo XIII. on St. Thomas of quin. v. 5, 3. S., 196–199. FRANCHI AUSONIO. Le caractère general de S. Thomas et sa philosophie. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1885, 497–513. FROSCHAMMER. Die Philosophie des Thomas von Aquin, 1887. GLOSSNER, M. Die Philosophie des hl. Thomas von Aquin. Gegen Freschammer. Jahr. f. Phil. u. Spek. Theol. vols. 6, 7, 8, 9. GUTBERLET, C. Thomas von Aquin und Immanuel Kant. Der Katholik, v. 73-2, 1893, 1-16, 139–152. D'HULST, MON. Panegyrique de S. Thomas d'Aquin. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1884, 189–209. WERNER, C. Der heilige Thomas von Aquino. 3 vols. New Edit. 1889. (This work is exhaustive. ) VAUGHAN, R. B. St. Thomas, his Life and Labors, 2 vols. BARBERIS, A. THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE. L'esthésimétrie et la psychologie de S. Thomas. Annal, de Phil. Chret., 1888, 113-123. BACELAERE VAN, F. L. St. Thomas's Philosophy of Knowledge. Phil. Rev., v. 12, 611–628. BELL, S. S. 224-241. Agnosticism. Christian Thought, 8th series, BOMBARD. De l'objectivité de la métaphysique. Annal. de Phil. Chret, 1885, 515-529. BONNETY, A. Nouvel examen de l'opinion de S. Thomas sur l'origine de nos connaissances. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1847, 31-49. BULLIOT, J. La veritable Assimilation scolastique. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1887, 156–171; 368-383; 443-463. CHAREYRE, J. P. L'Assimilation scolastique. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1887, Jan., Feb., March. DOMET DE VORGES. Theorie de la connaissance, d'après saint Thomas d'Aquin. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1886, 455-472. L'objectivité de la connaissance intellectuelle (d'après St. Thomas d'Aquin). Revue Neo-Scolastique, v. 3, 1896, 24-44. La Perception et la psychologie thomiste. DUBLIN REVIEW. St. Thomas's Theory of Knowledge. v. 25, N. S., 405-435. The Scholastic Doctrine of Science, v. 26, N. S., 151-185. The Scholastics on Intellect and Abstraction. v. 26, N. S., 400-441. The Physiological Psychology of St. Thomas. v. 7, 3. S., 345-358 FARGES, A. Theorie de la perception immediate d'après GARDAIR, J. Theorie de la connaissance d'après S. Thomas. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1891, 373-382, La connaissance d'après S. Thomas d'Aquin. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1887, 572-596. GREDT, P. J. Das Erkennen (as found in St. Thomas). Jahr. f. Phil. u. Spek. Theol., 1898, 408–421. GARDAIR, J. L'objectivité de la Sensation. Annal. de Phil. Chret., 1895, 9-29. CLARKE, R. F. The Sources of Agnosticism. Month, v. 45, 316-329. The Coryphaeus of Agnosticism. Ibid., 457-591. Some More Agnostic Fallacies. Ibid., v. 46, 375–391. HARRIS, W. T. Thoughts on the Basis of Agnosticism. Journal of Spec. Phil., v. 15, 113-120. MACKAY-SMITH, A. Agnosticism. Christian Thought, 2nd MOMERIE, A. W. Agnosticism. London, 1889. 3rd Edit. ROBERTY DE, E. Agnosticisme. Paris, 1892. L'Inconnaissable, sa métaphysique, sa psychologie. REGNON DE. Metaphysique des causes d'après saint Thomas et Albert le Grand. Paris, 1885. STRAUB, F. De objectivitate cognitionis humanae. SCHMID, A. Erkenntnisslehre. Freiburg, 1890, 2 vols. v. I, 401-438; v. 2, 170-180, 372-418. WARD, J. Naturalism and Agnosticism. Gifford Lectures, 96-98. WILLMANN, O. Geschichte des Idealismus. 3 vols. 1896, v. 2, 442-541. GOD. ANSELM, ST. In Philosophical Classics. Chicago. 1903. (The Ontological Argument, as held from Plato to our time, is given in the Introduction.) BARRY, G. W. The Battle of Theism. Dublin Review. v. 12, 3. S., 270-290. BERTIN. La Preuve de l'Existence de Dieu du Proslogium de S. Anselme. Annal. de Phril. Chret., 1895. 155-166. (The occasion of much discussion at the Scientific International Congress of Catholics at Brussels in 1894.) Résponse aux objections. Ibid., 277–286. BERTAULD, P. A. Etude critique des preuves de l'existence de Dieu. 2 vols. 1891. |