Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

In error to the supreme court of the state of Iowa. See 25 N. W. Rep. 686.

William L. Joy, for plaintiffs in error.
No opinion. Dismissed with costs, on mo-

JUMEL V. CHESTER.

(April 2, 1890.)

Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of New York.

Thomas M. Wheeler and George S. Boutwell, for appellants. Douglas Campbell, for appellee.

No opinion. Dismissed. per stipulation, on motion of Charles E. Hovey, in behalf of counsel.

JUSTICE V. VIRGINIA.

(March 21, 1890.)

In error to the supreme court of appeals of the state of Virginia.

John S. Wise, Joseph Christian, and John Goode, for plaintiff in error.

No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

KINGSBURY V. MURRAY.

(April 7, 1890.)

In error to the supreme court of the territory of Montana. See 12 Pac. Rep. 865. Hiram Knowles, for plaintiff in error. Walter H. Smith, for defendant in error.

No opinion. Dismissed, for the want of jurisdiction, and cause remanded to the supreme court of the state of Montana.

KITZMILLER V. PIERCE.

(May 1, 1890.)

In error to the supreme court of appeals of the state of West Virginia.

Joseph T. Hoke and C. C. Cole, for plaintiff in error.

No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

KRIPPENDORF V. HYDE.

(April 1, 1890.)

Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana. See 28 Fed. Rep. 788.

D. V. Burns, for appellant. J. L. McMaster, Augustin Boice, Benjamin Harrison, A. W. Hatch, Lew. Wallace, Horace Speed, and Henry Wise Garnett, for appellees.

No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

tion of Isaac S. Struble, in behalf of counsel LAKE SHORE & M. S. RY. Co. v. PENNSYLfor plaintiffs in error.

JEFFRIES V. BARTLETT.

(November 6, 1889.)

In error to the supreme court of the state of Georgia.

Henry Jackson, for plaintiff in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation of the parties.

VANIA.

(May 19, 1890.)

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

MILLIGAN V. SAVERY.

(April 17, 1890.)

In error to the supreme court of the terri

tory of Montana. 9 Pac. Rep. 894.

Thomas L. Napton, for plaintiffs in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pur

Charles H. Swan, for appellant. Edwin H. Broum, for appellee.

No opinion. Dismissed pursuant to the twenty-eighth rule.

suant to the tenth rule, and cause remanded MUTUAL BEN. LIFE INS. Co. v. SALENTINE. to the supreme court of the state of Montana.

[blocks in formation]

MONTROSS v. BULLARD.
(January 6, 1890.)

Appeal from the circuit court of the United

(November 18, 1889.)

In error to the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Wisconsin. See 24 Fed. Rep. 159.

James G. Jenkins and F. C. Winkler, for plaintiff in error. George P. Miller, for defendant in error.

No opinion. Judgment reversed, costs in this court to be paid by plaintiff in error, and cause remanded with directions to remand to the state court.

MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASS'N v. KEARY.

(April 21, 1890.)

In error to the circuit court of the United

States for the eastern district of Missouri. See 30 Fed. Rep. 359.

Alfred Taylor, Fred S. Parker, and W. C. Jones, for plaintiff in error.

No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of S. S. Henkle, on behalf of counsel for plaintiff in error.

NELSON V. BLANDING.

(October 21, 1889.)

In error to the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of California. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Calderon Carlisle, for defendant in error.

States for the northern district of Illinois. NEW ORLEANS WATER-WORKS Co. v. NEW See 27 Fed. Rep. 64.

J. W. Merriam, for appellants. L. L. Coburn, for appellees.

No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellants.

MORRIS V. TALBOTT.

(March 19, 1890.)

In error to the supreme court of the territory of Montana. See 9 Pac. Rep. 434.

Hiram Knowles, for plaintiff in error. W. H. Smith, for defendants in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, and cause remanded to the supreme court of the state of Montana.

MORSS V. MANCHESTER.

(June 8, 1889.)

Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of New York. See 32 Fed. Rep. 282.

ORLEANS.

(November 5, 1889.)

In error to the supreme court of the state of Louisiana.

Gus A. Breans, S. P. Blanc, Thomas J. Semmes, and J. R. Beckwith, for plaintiff in error. Edgar H. Farrar and B. F. Jones, for defendant in error.

No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error.

NEWPORT & W. R. & S. B. Co. v. BEAT

TIE.

(December 20, 1889.)

In error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Rhode Island.

Wheeler H. Peckham, for plaintiff in er ror. Lynde Harrison, for defendant in er

ror.

No opinion. Dismissed, per stipulation.

[blocks in formation]

In error to the supreme court of the state of Pennsylvania. See 13 Atl. Rep. 839.

Wayne Mac Veagh, for plaintiff in error. M. Hampton Todd, for defendants in error. No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation, on motion of E. D. F. Brady, on

OREGON RY. & NAV. Co. v. ERVIN. SAME behalf of counsel. v. FAHNESTOCK.

(April 30, 1890.)

Appeals from the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of New York. See 20 Fed. Rep. 577.

Artemas H. Holmes and John F. Dillon, for appellants. Thomas M. Hubbard, for appellees.

No opinion. Dismissed per stipulation.

OREGON RY. & NAV. Co. v. OREGONIAN RY. Co., (three cases.)

(March 31, 1890.)

In error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Oregon. See 27 Fed. Rep. 277; 28 Fed. Rep. 505.

J. N. Dolph, for plaintiff in error. George F. Edmunds and A. H. Garland, for defendant in error.

No opinion. Judgments reversed, with costs, and causes remanded with directions to grant new trials, on authority of the decision of this court in the case between the same parties reported in 130 U. S. 1, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 409.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

PRATT MANUF'G Co. v. BERRY.
(November 19, 1889.)

Appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the western district of Pennsylvania. See 27 Fed. Rep. 492.

Charles H. Knox, for appellant. J. W. Lee, for appellees.

No opinion. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.

[blocks in formation]
« ZurückWeiter »