Catalogue of the Type and Figured Specimens of Fossils, Minerals, Rocks, and Ores in the Department of Geology, United States National Museum: Catalogue of the type specimens of fossil invertebrates in the Department of geology, United States National Museum. By Charles Schuchert, assisted by W. H. Dall, T. W. Stanton, and R. S. Bassler. 1905U.S. Government Printing Office, 1905 |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
100th Merid Acad Amer Black River Ord Bull Calhoun County Caloosahatchie River Cannon Falls Chipola River Cincinnati Soc Colorado Cret Conrad Cotypes Cotypes and figured Dall Devonian Eocene Eureka District figs figured sections Final Rept Florida Fort Pierre Fort Thompson Fox Hills Cret Geogr Girty Guppy Hall and Whitfield Hist Holotype Holotype and paratypes Illinois Journ Jurassic Kentucky Laramie Cret Lorraine Ord Lower Cambrian Meek and Hayden Middle Cambrian Middle Devonian miles Minn Minnesota Miocene Montana Cret Moreau River Nevada Ohio Oligocene paratypes Phila Pierre Cret Plastotype Plesiotypes Pliocene Proc Richmond Ord Schuchert Scudder South Dakota Stanton Stones River Ord Surv Tenth Ann Terr Third Ann Trans Trenton Ord Troost Twelfth Ann U. S. Geol U. S. Nat Ulrich and Bassler Ulrich and Scofield Upper Carboniferous Upper Coal Measures Utah Utica Ord Vaughan VIII Wagner Free Inst Walcott West Indies White Wilkes U. S. Expl Wyoming
Beliebte Passagen
Seite 6 - Catalogue of the Cabinet of Natural History of the State of New York and of the Historical and Antiquarian Collection annexed thereto. 242p. 8vo. 18S3Handbooks 1893-date. In quantities, i cent for each 16 pages or less. Single copies postpaid as below. New York State Museum. 52p. il.
Seite 6 - ... History of the State of New York " and says: The regents of the University deserve great credit for directing the publication of this catalogue. Nothing is better adapted to secure permanently the interest for public collections and to contribute to their increase than the circulation of such catalogues. We only regret that no more direct reference is made to the individual specimens described and figured in the Natural History of New York. The importance of preserving such records to favor the...
Seite 14 - A specimen subseqnently named by the author after comparison with the type is called a Metatype. ' ' As this is not the meaning given by Thomas, it can not be accepted. The latter* says: The objection to " hypotype" [=metatype] as being too general and covering too many specimens of different origins appiies even more strongly to Lord Walsingham and Mr. Durrani's proposed extension. * * * Many a museum worker, who has to name large series of specimens from all sorts of localities, must constantly...
Seite 16 - A genus from its foundation belongs to one of three classes: — (1) MONOTYPICAL (ie described from a single species, no other being known; or described from a single specified species with which are associated other species considered to be identical in structure).
Seite 14 - The writer wou^d therefore define a neotype as a suppiementary type selected by an author, on which a species is to rest because of the loss of the original type or where the original material still extant is so poor or fragmentary that from it the characters of the species can not be determined with certainty. HEAUTOTYPE (new). — In a letter to the writer, Buckman proposes this term for "a specimen figured by an author as an illustration of his own already founded species such not being a proterotype"...
Seite 17 - NEcROTVPES (dead and form}: Forms formerly existing in a country but now extinct; eg, the horses and rhinoceroses are necrotypes of North America, indigenous species having once flourished on that continent, but become exterminated in prehistoric [or previous geologic] times." The Century Dictionary defines this term thus: "A type formerly extant in any region, afterwards extinct; thus, indigenous horses and rhinoceroses are necrotypes of North America. ' ' MARKING OF TYPE MATERIAL. All type material...
Seite 7 - ... have been recognized, and much confusion in nomenclature have been avoided. The chance preservation of some marked features may, indeed, give a hint as to what the whole specimen once was, but too often a suggestion only is thus offered, while the real nature of such types must always remain in doubt. A type in Paleontology should consist of the remains of a single individual, and this should stand as the original representative of the name given. A second specimen, or even more, may be used...