DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Washington, D. C. This publication is held for sale by the Department at cost price, as follows: Volume 1, from July, 1881, to June, 1883 . 31. 05 Volume 2, from July, 1883, to June, 1884 1. 15 Volume 3, from July, 1884, to June, 1885 1. 07 Volume 4, from July, 1885, to June, 1886 1. 15 Volume 5, from July, 1886, to June, 1887 1. 05 Volume 6, from July, 1887, to June, 1888 1. 45 Volume 7, from July, 1888, to December, 1888. 1. 10 Volume 8, from January, 1889, to June, 1889 1. 16 Volume 9, from July, 1889, to December, 1889 1. 15 Volume 10, from January, 1890, to Juve, 1890. 1. 15 Correspondence relating to the above publications, and all remittances (which must be by postal-note or money-order) should be addressed to the Secretary of the Inte. rior, Washington, D. C. TABLE OF CASES REPORTED. '. Ackerson v. Dean.. Company, Anderson v...... Company v.(on review). Arkansas, State of, Forbes et al. v. Arkansas, State of, v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway Company... Arkansas, St. Louis, Iron Mount ain and Southern Mountain Railway Company v... Atterbery, United States v. (on 108 664 Page. Page. 477 Blanchet, Dahon v..... 61 642 Bogue, Northern Pacific Railroad 587 Company v 386 482 Boos v. Whitcomb.. 584 Bottomly, Waldroff v 133 572 Bowker, Edward ..... 548 566 Boyd, Connelly v. (on review).. 489 388 Boyd v. State of Oregon........ 315 421 Boyer v. Union Pacific Railway Company 568 258 Brecheisen, Vaughn v. 585 163 Brennan v. Hume 160 Broste, Svenneby v.... Brown, Northern Pacific Rail105 road Company v 662 Brown, Quam v Brunner v. Lux... 352 45 Buckley, John 297 Bundy v. Fremont Townsite (on 36 review)... 595 Burgess v. Hogaboom....... 470 214 | Burns, Frank.... 365, 628 551 Cady v. Queen et al. (on review). 575 546 Cage, Chinn v... 480 210 California, State of, Harvey et al.v 217 41 Callanan et al. 1'. Chicago, Mil634 waukee and St. Paul Railway Company 285 499 Cameron, Helen M... 195 13 Carneron Lode, Erie Lode v 655 Canning v. Fail 657 194 Canon, John R... 78 Capricorn Placer. 641 504 Carnes v. Smith 100 296 Carson v. Finity. 451 Cass County, Illinois... review) Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Company (on review) Arnold v. Cooley. 22 294 Central Pacific Railroad Com485 pany (on review)........ 439 205 Central Pacific Railroad Com694 pany v. Bass...... 498 156 | Central Pacific Railroad Com612 pany, Icard v...... 464 III Bailey, Cone v...... Company r. Trevillion.. Railway Company v. Beck, William K. Bennett, Dickson v..... Berdan, Green v...... Bernhard, Thatcher v... Bickel et al. v. Irvine. Binum, Ravezza v..... Black, Largey, et al. v Blake ». Marsh.. 532 et Central Pacific Railroad Com pany, Plaetke v Central Pacific Railroad Com pany et al., v. Rees ... Central Pacific Railroad Com pany, Showell v..... Cetral Pacific Railroad Com pany, United States v Champaign County (State of Illinois). Chapman's Heirs et al., Baird v.. Chapman v. Patterson... Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company, Callanan al., v. Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company v. Mellbratb Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company, Sbire et al., .. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company Childs, Walter C ... Childs '. Southern Pacific Rail road Company (on review).... Chinn v. Cage... Chillson v. Mahan.. Church, William L...... Clearwaters et al., Linville v.... Clement, Edward C Cline, Southern Pacific Railroad Company v... ing Co. v. Gage.. Page. Page. Dahon v. Blanchet... 61 317 Dailey, Hornback v 318 Danford v. Ellsworth. 341 281 Davis r. Kaminsky 346 Davinson v. Gabus et al 114 167 Dayton, Lyman C 159 Dean, Ackerson v..... 477 466 Dean, Johu J 446 De Celle, M. H. (on review) 81 121 | Dermody, Michael. 419 210 | Devereux, Huntoon v. 408 129 Dickinson, G. T 449 Dickson v. Bennett. 451 Diehl, Tripp ”.. 591 285 Diemer, Lewis et al. 577 Diggins, Rohrbough v 136 684 Dougherty, James.. 79 Douglas, John W..... 116 Douglas County, State of Illinois 446 85 Dox v. State of Wisconsin 39 Dronberger, Emily M..... 88 147 Dubuque and Pacific Railroad 173 Company, Prindeville v.. 575 Dunn v. Shepherd et al 139 630 Durham. Samuel P 557 480 Eads, Weaver v 279 20 Eaton, Edwin J 336 Edmondston, Raney v 387 59 338 Eisemann, Albert 539 Elling, Lyman v 474 Elliott v. Ryan (on review)..... 491 31 Ellsbury, Alexander v 482 339 Ellsworth, Danford v 341 483 Elmore, Henry 400 588 Emblen, Reeves v. (on review).. 600 21 Emerson, Roots v..... 169 96 English, Jacob E.. 409 569 Epley v. Trick (on review) 3 Erie Lode v. Cameron Lode... 655 422 Ertel, Iowa Railroad Land Com546 176 489 pany v... Evans, Joseph... 603 Evans, Lunsford v.. 211 534 Everitt v. Zimmerman et al..... 437 324 Ewing v. Rourke. 297 551 10 Fail, Canning 657 495 Farley, Jacob 661 216 Ferguson 1. Snyder. 234 274 | Finity, Carson 1'..... 532 117 Finnerty, Warner v 433 188 Fish, Mary..... 253 Flagstaff Townsite, Gonzales v.. 348, 651 616 Fletcher v. Roode 250 598 222 606 Page. 217 681 136 391 273 105 153 107 229 266 326 166 513 385 136 152 470 493 472 318 171 83 160 408 Page. Fogarty, Cyr, et al. v 616 Harvey et al. v. State of California Forbes et al, State of Arkansas v. 163 Hartzell, Thomas B........... Fountain, Abram W....... 260 Hastings and Dakota Railroad 582 | Hay v. Yager, et al. Fremont townsite, Bundy v. (on Headen, Lingle v... review)..... 595 Heirs of Partridge, Thompson v. Fugelli, Northern Pacific Rail Hellekson, Christopher road Company v.... 288 Henderson, Thomas E Furguson, Crawford v 274 Hermann, George F Herre, Susan Gabus et al., Davisson v 114 Herriott, George, et al. Gage, Continental Gold and Sil Higday, C. L... ver Mining Company v 534 | Higgins, Rohrbough v Galbraith, Isaac M.. 62 Hinds, Wharton v Gale v. Northern Pacific Railroad Hogaboom, Burgess v. Company 307 Hone, John C .... Gamble v. Sault Ste. Marie.... 375 Hopkins, Henry St. George L... Gardner v. Spencer et al 398 Hornback v. Dailey.... Garnsey, Charles L.... 340 Huerfano Valley Ditch and ReserGauger, Henry 220 voir Company ... Gerold, Russell v.... 18 Huling, Lewis C. Glafcke, Yates v... 673 Hume, Brennan v.... Giend v. Owens 461 Huntoon v. Devereux... Goldstein, Louisa 155 Hurd, Northern Pacific Railroad Gonzales v. Flagstaft Townsite.. 348, 651 Company v ..... Goode, Wilber v. 527 Goodwin, Wood v Icard v. Central Pacific Railroad 689 Grand Rapids and Indiana Rail Company road Company 676 Illinois, State of Green v. Berdan.... Illinois, State of (Cass County). 294 Greene, McWeeney r. (on review) 147 Illinois, State of (Champaign Gregg v. Hallock ... County).. 373 Griffin v. Pettigrew 510 Illinois, State of (Douglas CounGriffiths, Franceway et al. v 691 ty) Iowa Railroad Land Company v. Grunsfeld, Alfred.... 508 Ertel...... Gulbranson, Hagen v.. 238 Irvine, Bickel et al. v...... Hagen v. Gulbranson.. 238 Jackson, McFarland v Hallock, Gregg v..... 373 Jackson, W. S....... Halvorson, Northern Pacific Rail Jacobson r. Remonder road Company v..... 15 Jansen, Costello v Hamilton, Alexander 351 Jaramilla, McDonald v.. Hannibal and St. Joseph Rail Johnson, Andrew. road Company.. 610 Johnson, Milum v. Hansen, Mulligan v. 311 Jones, Milton Hardin, James A 313 Jones, United States v. Kaminsky, Davis v road Company 264 Kaufman et al., Puckett v Harten, Thomas D.. 130 Keigan, William H.. Hartley v. Young.. 181 | Kellem v. Ludlow 683 464 398 22 121 446 176 205 405 12 256 10 276 681 624 468 23 346 410 651 560 |
0 Rezensionen Rezensionen werden nicht überprüft, Google sucht jedoch gezielt nach gefälschten Inhalten und entfernt diese Rezension schreiben |