EACH DAY'S PRICE OF STOCKS IN MAY, 1799. Bank 3perCt 3 per Ct. 14perCt.sperCt.sperCt. Long | Short | India | S. Sea Old India Exchq. Imp. | Imp. | Irish Eng. Latt.) Frish frith Englis Stock. Bk Red. Confols. Confol Navy. 1797 Ann. Ann. Stock. Stock. Ann. Bonds. Bille. 3perCt. Anu. 5perCt. Tickets. Tickets. Prizes. Prizes. 28 Sunday ∞ ∞ ∞ 566 83 151 83 6 170 843 85 1712 854 4555w4 29 548 30 1374 54 54급 55 854 69 864 138 554 554 86호 2 56 56 3 139 55 561 4139 55 56 55% 553 7 139 552 56 666666 959 90000 2100-1000/41/00 555555 56555+ 69/ 85 85 85 84年 844 83 16 691 693 69 68 542 682 544 543 544 542 ་་ 548 541 55 55 555555 แกงเเกเ 554 543 555 455 55 554 55 55 685 68 in/com/~100 66666 ∞ ∞ ∞ 96 68/1 69 69 844 86 834 833 851 83 mymicariα 555666 555555 56 694 70 864 864 87 87 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ فيا 833 84 842 848 85 85 344+nn 24 1392 552 56 25 1394 56 26 Sunday 27 1394 5555 693 872 J. BRANSCOMB, Stock-Broker, at the Lucky Lottery Office, No. 1, Holbourn. METEOROLOGICAL TABLE for June, 1799. Height of Fahrenheit's Thermometer. NNN D. of 7. Saw the firit fwallow near Baguly in Cheshire, an affemblage alfo of cuckoos; at this place obferved better grafs than any in my journey from the South. Of the fwallow, a gentleman had obferved two over the canal at Bootle on the 29th of May; on the ad of June a few more at the fame place; on the fourth fome hundreds, faintly fluttering over a large refervoir of water; on the 6th about twenty fwallows feen for the first time this feafon about two miles farther North; the information figned T. P.8. Examined the ftate of vegetation in my own ground. The horfe chefnut as far as I could carry in my eye about the fame itate of foliation as one obferved in the vicinity of London on the ad, and the moit early one obferved upon the read. The mountain afh, Sycamore, Gentleman's Magazine: For JUNE, 1799. BEING THE SIXTH NUMBER OF VOL. LXIX. PART I. Mr. URBAN, June 17. ***OU will, I hope, permit one of your conftant readers to exprefs, in your much-approved Magazine, the fatisfaction he has received from the juftice done by the authors of the Anti-jacobin Review, in their laft Number, to the perfonal and profeffional character of a great Prelate; and from their acknowledge ment of the inaccuracy into which they have been led (by mifinformation), refpecting the conference which lately took place between that Prelate and a clergyman, who had omitted, in the public fervice of the Church, the prayer in time of war. This candid acknowledgement feems to me to make a material change in the complexion of the bufinefs, to fet the question at once in a right point of view, and to remove all just ground of cenfure, as far as the learned Prelate himself is concerned. For, as it now appears that there was no infolent behaviour on the part of the offender, no profligate avowal of difaffection, no contest between the authority of the Prelate and the pertinacity of the priest; but, on the contrary, the deportment and the language of the latter was perfectly decent and refpectful throughout; his diocefan was unquestionably left at liberty to determine for himfelf what degree of punishment he fhould inflict upon him; and, if he chose too mild a one, it was an error of judge ment, or too great gentlenefs of difpo fition, not a compromise of his autho❤ rity, which was never called in quef tion. Whether the punishment he in flicted was fufficiently fevere or not, is a matter cf opinion, and different perfons will probably think differently concerning it. For my own part, I confefs that, as the repetition of the offence charged upon this man (the omiffion of the prayer) was com pletely obviated by his exclufion from the chapel; and as he was alfo punished, not only by the difgrace of that exclufion, but by the lofs of half his falary; it appears to me that his lordship deserves no blame for adopting the milder mode of punishment. Certain at least it is, that his lenity in this inftance (fhould it even be deemed too great) could not poffibly be owing to any want of fpirit, or firmness in the exercife of his authority; fince, on many fimilar occafions, he has difplayed a degree of fortitude and refolution which do him great honour; and, as the Reviewers themfelves very liberally admit, has in one particular inftance fignilized his zeal in a manner worthy his flation. In fact, it is well known that, in all important and effential points, he has diftinguished himfelf by a confcientious and manly dif charge of his duty, and has never been deterred by any danger or by any menaces from refifting, with vigour and with effect, whatever appeared to him materially injurious to the interests of religion, or the good order and discipline of the Church of England. Yours, &c. ERASMUS. fycamore, laylock, tachamach, hazel, and lorch, foliated; the last in bloom. Cuckoo fings.-10. Periwinkle flowers.-14. Líme foliates.-15. Chickweed flowers.—16. Shepherd's purfe flowers.-20. Dead fottle flowers,-21. Elm foliates.-24. The ftorm which began on the 21ft abates this day. It seems to have damaged the bloffom of the fruit-trees, of which there is great abundance, and more than the trees, without fome ac→ cident or steps taken, could have fupported.-29. A white butterfly appears. Landrail heard in the evening.-30. Hore-bell flowers. Fall of rain 1.50 inch. Evaporation 2.8 inch. Walton, near Liverpool. J. HOLT. Mr. URBAN, S June 15: As your Mifcellany is not unfre quently made the channel of Heraldic as well as of other more ufeful knowledge, I hope the following confined account of the family of Lord Viscount Bandon will obtain a place in your next. My motive for this proceeding is the mis-ftatement which was made in regard to this noblemany vol. LXIX. p. 274. The great-grandfather of this noble lord, Francis Bernard, efq. defcended from an antient and honourable family of that name (of which was William Fitz-Bernard, living in the reign of Edward III. poffeffed of lands in the county of Cork, in which county the family have ever fince remained), was feated at Caftle Bernard, near Bandon. He married, Feb. 28, 1693, Alica, daughter of Stephen Ludlow, efq. (brother to Edmund, the Republican), and by her (who died May, 1741) had ifiue, 1. Francis, born Sept. 28, 1698, married, March 26, 1722, Right. Hon. Lady Anne Fitzmaurice-Pelty, daughter of Henry Earl of Shelburne (grandfather to the prefent Marquis of Lanfdown,) and niece of Thomas, 23d Lord Ker ry, created Earl of Kerry, but died without fue; 2. Stephen of Profpect Hall, Waterfordshire, died unmarried; 3. Arthur; 4. William; who both died unmarried; 5 Elizabeth, married the Right Hon. James, the feventh Lord and third Vife. Charlemont, by whom' the had iffue the prefent Earl of Charle mont. Ludlow, who fucceeded his father, Francis Bernard, efq. died in 1731, having been appointed by Queen Anne folicitor general, prime ferjeant, and judge of the court of Common Pleas. He was fucceeded by his fon Ludlow, who, before the deceale of his elder brothers, was a major in the army; was born, April 15, 1705, and, fucceeding to the eftate of Calle Bernard, married a daughter of the antient family of Echlin, of Ardquin, Downthire, by whom he had iffue, 1. Charles, died unmarried; 2. James; and others. James, the fecond fon, fucceeded his father, and was elected to parliament for the county of Cork. He married, first, Mis. Alcock, reli&t of Major Alcock; and, zdly, Elizabeth, daughter of the Rev. Mr. Sullivan, by whom (who re-married after his deceafe with Major Browne) he had no iffue. By his former lady he left iffue, 1. Francis Lord Bandon; 2. Elizabeth, died young; 3. Rofa, married the Right Hon. William Lord Riverfdale, Baron of Rathcormuck; and, by his lord hip, who deceafed in Dec. 1787, the has iffue William, the prefent Lord Riversdale; James-Bernard, Richard, fince dead; Francis, fince dead; Charles-Ludlow; Henry; Ludlow; Efther-Charlotte; and Charlotte; 4. Efther, married Samplon Stawell, of Kilbritain, efq. of the fame family as the late Baronefs Stawell; 5. Mary. marcied Auguftus Warien, eldeft fon of Sir Robert Warren, bart.; 6. Charfotte, married the Right Hon. Hayes St. Leger Lord Viscount Doneraile, and has iffue Hayes, Charlotte, Harriet; 7. Elizabeth, married Richard Acklom, of Maltby, York thi, efq. eldeft fon of Jonathan Acklom, of Wifeton hall, Nottinghamshire, efq. Francis, the prefent vilcount, before the deceafe of his father, was elected to parliament for Bandon, of which borough his lordship has the patronage. On the decease of his father, he fucceeded to the family feat of CaftieBernard, furrounded by a fine park, and beautifully watered by the river Bandon. In 1793, his lordship was called up to the Houfe of Lords by the title of Lord Bandon, Baron of CattleBernard, by which title he took his feat; and was farther advanced to the title of Viscount Bandon, of Bandon, O. 6, 1795, by which title he took his feat in parliament, and gave his vote for that falutary mealure, an Union. His lordip is alfo colonel of the Bandon militia. He married, in Feb. 1784, the Right Han, Lady Hen, rietta Boyle, only daughter of Richard Earl of Shannon (by his wife Catharine, niece to the Earl of Befborough), by whom his lordship has iffue, 1. the Hon. James Bernard, born Jan. 12,1785; Hon. Richard B. born Sept. 4, 1787; Henrietta; Catharina; Charlotta, and two other fons. C. L. T. Elanenfie Mr. URBAN, Cambridge, June 17. IT having been erroneouilly. Hated for fome time paft in the News-papers, &c. that the Right Hon. Anna-Catha rine, Countess of Antrim, was a widow previous to her union with Sir Harry Vane Tempest, bart. I am defirous of proving the fallehood of this affertion through the channel of your widefpreading and valuable Mifcellany. The Moft Noble Randal William, Marquis of Antrim, Sixth Earl of Antrim, Viscount Dualace, of An trim, |