...Rep. 488. COSTS.—Interlocutory costs — Setting-off against judgment.—By Reg. Gen. Hil. T., 1853, "no set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted." In the case of Scott v. Richelbourg (11 CBR 447), Mr. Justice Maule said : " Interlocutory costs are...

...the general costs of the cause, the costs of the trial shall be allowed to the opposite party. LXIII. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted." As to distributive costs, under the 62nd rule, see the case of TreAerne v. Gardner (29 LT Rep. 327),...

...rules pro- rendered unimulgated by the judges in Hilary Term, 1832. It is there- form by ordered, " that no set-off of damages or costs between parties,...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted" (3). The costs here referred to, are such as are taxed be- Costs referred tween attorney and client,...

...the general costs of the cause, the costs of the trial shall be allowed to the opposite party. 63. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted. EJECTMENT. 114. If the plaintiff in ejectment appears at the trial, and the defendant does not appear,...

...To do this would prejudice the lien of the plaintiff's attorney. Reg. Gen. Hil. 16 Viet. s. 63, is that "no set-off of damages or costs between parties...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted (a)." In Scott v. Count de Richebourg (b) Maule J. says, that " interlocutory costs" are all the costs...

...between parties shall be allowed to the prejudio of the attorney's lien for costs in the particular suil against which the set-off is sought; provided nevertheless...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted (a)." In v. Count de Richebourg (b) Maule J. says, that " int locutory costs" are all the costs the...

...held to be no waiver of the plaintiff's right to these costs (Bentley v. Dawes, 10 Exch. 347). 63. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted. As to setting-off interlocutory costs, see Melville v. La-son (LJ 27, QB 318). The cases relating to...

...in Hilary Term, 2 W. 4., and re-enacted in the same words down to the present time. By that rule " no set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...suit, awarded to the adverse party may be deducted." Mr. Quain's argument was, adopting the words of Mansfield CJ in Figes v. Adams (a), that " the rule...

...in Eilart/ Term, 2 W. 4., and re-enacted in the same words dowato the present time. By that rule " no set-off of damages or costs between parties shall be allowed to the prejudice of the attorney's b'en for costs in the particular sui^fc against which the set-off is sought, provided, neverthe—...

...returnable. 336 335-6 proceeding in the taxation of costs, or of an attorney's bill. 336-7 336 93. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...prejudice of the attorney's lien for costs in the TMd'i Prertire. particular suit against which the set-off is sought, provided, 8tb ^f L 9t ^ i "' nevertheless,...