HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

The New Oxford Book of English Prose by John…
Loading...

The New Oxford Book of English Prose (original 1998; edition 2000)

by John Gross

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
1253216,527 (3.75)None
It’s sad to find misogyny still alive and well and popping up like weeds. Editor John Gross had only 6 pages to devote to Nathaniel Hawthorne in this anthology, and he chose to give a full page to an excerpt entitled “Englishwomen” from Our Old Home. The opening sentence of the excerpt contains the phrase “ it strikes me that an English lady of fifty is apt to become a creature less refined and delicate, so far as her physique goes, than anything that we western people class under the name of woman” (402). So Englishwomen over fifty can’t even be classed with women, they are instead “creatures”?

Hawthorne continues describing the archetypal 50+ English lady as “massive with solid beef and streaky tallow,” which causes him to think of “steaks and sirloins” (402). She is “elephantine,” “usually grim and stern,” with a “sturdy capacity for trampling down a foe.” Not content with expressing contempt for middle-aged Englishwomen’s bodies, Hawthorne then proceeds to state that these women are strong only physically, but morally are weak, “powerless and timid” in anything that calls for moral or ethical fortitude outside of her homegrown “conventionalities” (402-3). Hawthorne wraps up his dissection by stating that “somewhere in this enormous bulk there must be hidden the modest, slender, violet-nature of a girl,” and laments that, alas, the girl must grown up into the overpowering creature of a middle-aged Englishwoman (403).

I assume that John Gross found this piece irresistibly amusing, and did not consider that women readers of this anthology could find it offensive and misogynist, especially read as an excerpt without any context in which to mitigate or explain the virulent disgust displayed towards older women. I hope that Gross hesitated before including rants against racial and religious minorities, but I admit that I’m not going to continue reading this anthology, which a (male reviewer) on the back cover touts as sure to give everyone “hundreds of unexpected pleasures and rediscoveries.” It certainly did contain one unexpected discovery for me. ( )
  eowynfaramir | Jun 8, 2014 |
Showing 3 of 3
There are many things to criticize about this book but I still like it. Ultra short entries from many writers, beautifully laid out on the page, with the emphasis on as many writers as possible being showcased. No attempt was made by the editor to show the dynamic qualities that build emotional power within the text. The only purpose was to display what can be achieved by a short passage or sentence. 993 pp, Index. ( )
  sacredheart25 | Nov 8, 2023 |
It’s sad to find misogyny still alive and well and popping up like weeds. Editor John Gross had only 6 pages to devote to Nathaniel Hawthorne in this anthology, and he chose to give a full page to an excerpt entitled “Englishwomen” from Our Old Home. The opening sentence of the excerpt contains the phrase “ it strikes me that an English lady of fifty is apt to become a creature less refined and delicate, so far as her physique goes, than anything that we western people class under the name of woman” (402). So Englishwomen over fifty can’t even be classed with women, they are instead “creatures”?

Hawthorne continues describing the archetypal 50+ English lady as “massive with solid beef and streaky tallow,” which causes him to think of “steaks and sirloins” (402). She is “elephantine,” “usually grim and stern,” with a “sturdy capacity for trampling down a foe.” Not content with expressing contempt for middle-aged Englishwomen’s bodies, Hawthorne then proceeds to state that these women are strong only physically, but morally are weak, “powerless and timid” in anything that calls for moral or ethical fortitude outside of her homegrown “conventionalities” (402-3). Hawthorne wraps up his dissection by stating that “somewhere in this enormous bulk there must be hidden the modest, slender, violet-nature of a girl,” and laments that, alas, the girl must grown up into the overpowering creature of a middle-aged Englishwoman (403).

I assume that John Gross found this piece irresistibly amusing, and did not consider that women readers of this anthology could find it offensive and misogynist, especially read as an excerpt without any context in which to mitigate or explain the virulent disgust displayed towards older women. I hope that Gross hesitated before including rants against racial and religious minorities, but I admit that I’m not going to continue reading this anthology, which a (male reviewer) on the back cover touts as sure to give everyone “hundreds of unexpected pleasures and rediscoveries.” It certainly did contain one unexpected discovery for me. ( )
  eowynfaramir | Jun 8, 2014 |
I got this as a free giveaway at a conference (ESSE, 2000), and kept it around for years but finally admitted it was useless. Usually in anthologies the excerpts are chosen to make you hungry to read the whole books, but these excerpts were fragmentary and uninteresting.
1 vote athenasowl | Nov 21, 2006 |
Showing 3 of 3

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.75)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2
2.5
3 2
3.5
4 2
4.5
5 3

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 202,657,457 books! | Top bar: Always visible